meta data for this page
Differences
This shows you the differences between two versions of the page.
| Both sides previous revisionPrevious revisionNext revision | Previous revision | ||
| sw:opnsense:issues [2019/04/04 13:03] – niziak | sw:opnsense:issues [2025/08/20 12:12] (current) – niziak | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
| - | ====== multi wan: lan gw was chosen | + | ====== OPNSense issues ====== |
| + | |||
| + | ===== WAN bandwidth limited ===== | ||
| + | |||
| + | 4 port '' | ||
| + | |||
| + | * last post in: [[https:// | ||
| + | * [[https:// | ||
| + | * [[]] | ||
| + | https:// | ||
| + | |||
| + | https:// | ||
| + | |||
| + | [[https:// | ||
| + | |||
| + | |||
| + | ===== flowd ===== | ||
| + | flowd.log is 5GB. | ||
| + | flowd_aggregate.py died (Insight Aggregator service). | ||
| + | Workaround is to use monit: | ||
| + | |||
| + | {{: | ||
| + | |||
| + | ===== Multiwan ===== | ||
| + | |||
| + | ==== multiwan: when primary WAN fails, local connectivity stops ==== | ||
| + | Primary WAN fails: | ||
| + | - Local (from OPNSense host) DNS doesn' | ||
| + | - local connectivity also doesn' | ||
| + | - internet for LAN users works (switched to WAN2) | ||
| + | - one LAN device cannot connect to 8.8.8.8 DNS server, because this request is still forwarded to WAN1 | ||
| + | |||
| + | SOLUTION ? | ||
| + | PROPOSALS: | ||
| + | - Allow DNS server list to be overridden by DHCP/PPP on WAN = CHECKED | ||
| + | |||
| + | |||
| + | ==== multiwan: port reflection not working ==== | ||
| + | **Scenario: | ||
| + | * Not possible to connect to port-forwarded service using WAN IP | ||
| + | **Problem 1** | ||
| + | * Problem caused by Policy based routing with Multi WAN setup: | ||
| + | * Firewall--> | ||
| + | **Solution 1** | ||
| + | * Add rule before default gateway rule: LAN net --> LAN net to use Gateway default | ||
| + | |||
| + | **Problem 2** | ||
| + | * When interface group is used as interface in **Firewall --> NAT --> Port Forward**, reply-to rules are not generated. | ||
| + | **Solution 2** | ||
| + | * Do not create NAT rule for **interface group**. Use duplicated rules for each WAN interface | ||
| + | |||
| + | ==== multiwan: port forwards ==== | ||
| + | |||
| + | **Scenario: | ||
| + | * Interface group WAN created, to group to WAN1 and WAN2 interfaces. | ||
| + | * Prot forward defined from WAN to WAN:NETWORK TCP/UDP port 2196. to host 192.168.0.231: | ||
| + | **Problem: | ||
| + | * Connection from world to WAN1 IP port 2196 works. | ||
| + | * Connection from world to WAN2 IP prot 2196 doesn' | ||
| + | **Solution ** | ||
| + | * Do not create NAT rule for **interface group**. Use duplicated rules for each WAN interface | ||
| + | |||
| + | |||
| + | ===== multi wan: lan gw was chosen ==== | ||
| If gateway switching is used, it is needed to set all not WAN gateways as forced down. | If gateway switching is used, it is needed to set all not WAN gateways as forced down. | ||
| Line 28: | Line 91: | ||
| Firewall --> Settings --> Advanced: Tick **Disable force gateway** (Outgoing packets from this firewall on an interface which has a gateway will normally use the specified gateway for that interface. When this option is set the route will be selected by the system routing table instead.) | Firewall --> Settings --> Advanced: Tick **Disable force gateway** (Outgoing packets from this firewall on an interface which has a gateway will normally use the specified gateway for that interface. When this option is set the route will be selected by the system routing table instead.) | ||
| + | |||
| + | ====== cannot reach another VLAN from VPN ====== | ||
| + | |||
| + | Check for asymetric routing. Firewall cannot track one way packet flow so packets are blocke by default rule. | ||
| + | Solution is to add pass rule without connection tracking enabled (tracking '' | ||